Article

How District Size and Demographics Define Core Curriculum Buyer Segments

Core curriculum purchasing is a six-stage journey that varies widely across districts. We identified three market segments (Champions, Negotiators, and Technicians) and analyzed their buyer profiles to understand how each group navigates the complex path from early signals to final adoption.


Three Core Curriculum Segments Demonstrated Predictability

trophy

District Champions value and use student and teacher voices to identify district-specific needs. The piloting stage is critical to garnering this feedback. In-house data is a key piece of final adoption decisions, as well as initial scoping.

However, the focus on district data may result in Champions missing other structured criteria to inform their evaluative lens and feedback interpretation.

image
handshake

Well-resourced Negotiators wield a high degree of market power, allowing them to get to what they need and negotiate prices with little friction.

Notably, Negotiators may face more challenges with balancing the weighting of resources, in addition to group-relevant biases.

image
process

Process Technicians are confident in their ability to identify evidence sources and are interested in capturing the efficacy of adoptions upon implementation. Technicians try to stay in touch with their end users from procurement through to implementation.

However, their experience may spur overconfidence and potential resistance to new sources.

image

Deep Dive

The curriculum segments can be identified based on relative differences in district size, priority classification, and EdReports use.

image

Segments revealed unique preferences for evidence sources

Preferred Sources of Evidence

  • User feedback from focus groups and surveys
  • Conferences and forums

Why is the Source Preferred?

  • Feedback from users provides the most contextually relevant data

Greatest Barriers to Evidence Use

  • Lack of structured or objective evaluative lens

Preferred Sources of Evidence

  • Vendor websites

Why is the Source Preferred?

  • Websites are the simplest and fastest route of accessing information about products and prices

Greatest Barriers to Evidence Use

  • Balancing the weighting of multiple sources

Preferred Sources of Evidence

  • District-standardized rubrics
  • Online rubrics and instructional material reviews

Why is the Source Preferred?

  • Rubrics and reviews provide objective criteria from a trustworthy, unbiased source

Greatest Barriers to Evidence Use

  • Overconfidence and potential resistance to new sources

The Procurement Journey for Core Curriculum Purchasing

Highlights the similarities across the three segments and involves six stages: signal, mobilize, evaluate, pilot, winnow, and purchase.

Related Insights

Webinar

Bridging the Gap: Connecting District Needs with EdTech Solutions That Work

February 2026 45 min video

Our webinar featured a research presentation and panel discussion on key themes in quality EdTech adoption. Our expert panelists were: Nicole Langford, who leads research...

Success Story

Designing Impactful Quality Seals to Engage Users

October 2025 6 min read

Quality seals or quality certifications are used in different ways across the professional learning, core curriculum, and education technology (EdTech) ecosystems. An organization providing EdTech...

Success Story

Identifying and Utilizing Effective Marketing Channels

November 2025 6 min read

Numerous organizations, particularly those of smaller or recent establishment, face the challenge of broadening their user base, especially when district buyers lack awareness of their...

Success Story

Establishing Trustworthy Brand Awareness

October 2025 6 min read

An organization was looking to understand and address two things about the non-users of its evidence on quality professional learning (those in their target audience...

Explore all insights

Get Expert Guidance on Evidence

Our experts help leaders and partners apply market signals, share knowledge, and make confident, evidence-based decisions.

Ask an Expert